Canada Needs a New Pesticide Playbook
As Canada pivots away from the United States and the rules of the game change, we need a serious rethink on pesticide regulation.
Right now, decision-making on pesticides is structurally integrated with that of the United States, creating problems for Canada’s trade agenda, the health of Canadians and even the Government itself. We need a new playbook.
Case in point is the approval of three new PFAS, or “forever chemicals.” Since late 2025, the U.S. EPA has approved cyclobutrifluram, isocycloseram and epyrifenacil, and Health Canada’s Pesticides Regulatory Directorate (the successor to the PMRA) has followed closely behind on all three:
Pesticide
🇺🇸 EPA final approval
🇨🇦 Pesticide Regulatory Directorate registration
Cyclobutrifluram
US: Nov. 5, 2025
CDA: RD2025-12, Dec. 19, 2025 – six weeks later
Isocycloseram
US: Nov. 20, 2025—one action, all uses together
CDA: RD2026-03, Jan. 28, 2026 – 12 weeks later (cockroach bait + cereal seed treatment) and
CDA: R D2026-13, May 21, 2026 (foliar/soil uses on corn, leafy vegetables, …Read More
We’re taking Health Canada to court over glyphosate.
We’re taking Health Canada to court over glyphosate.
This video was recorded in 2019 for Giving Tuesday, but since then, Moms Across America tested Bob’s Red Mill gluten free flour and found it contains high levels of glyphosate!
The findings make our lawsuit that much more important.
We know there are many worthy causes out there, but if you care about what’s in the food you’re eating, please consider making a tax-deductible donation to Safe Food Matters’ legal fund.
Federal Cabinet Gives Itself Power to Sidestep Regulations, Including on Pesticides
Safe Food Matters President Mary Lou McDonald joined veteran broadcaster Keith Wiley recently on The Ecocentric Radio Show to discuss the federal government’s new powers to sidestep regulations, including those affecting pesticides and environmental protections.
The conversation examines recent legislative changes that could allow federal cabinet to override certain regulatory requirements, raising important questions about transparency, democratic oversight and the future of Canada’s regulatory system.
Drawing on Safe Food Matters’ ongoing work to hold Health Canada accountable for pesticide decisions, McDonald also discusses the organization’s ongoing glyphosate litigation, which challenges Health Canada’s regulation of glyphosate and raises broader concerns about Canada’s pesticide approval process and regulatory oversight. The conversation explores why these issues matter for Canadians and what the new legislation could mean for environmental and public health protections.
🎧 Click on image below to listen to the full Interview:
Hosted by Keith Wiley on The Ecocentric Radio Show, Canada’s longest-running
environmental news radio broadcast, with …Read More
Public interest groups slam changes to federal pesticide law as unwarranted, dangerous and undemocratic
Amendments buried in Bill C-30 weaken environmental protections
JUNE 17, 2026 — OTTAWA | TRADITIONAL AND UNCEDED TERRITORY OF THE ALGONQUIN ANISHINAABE NATION — Public interest organizations denounce amendments to Canada’s Pest Control Products Act included in the government’s omnibus financial bill, as Bill C-30 moves to the final vote in the House of Commons. The bill is being expedited through Parliament, after motions passed earlier this week curtailing debate and amendments.
The changes to Canada’s pesticide law in Bill C-30, along with others introduced in a separate budget implementation bill (C-31), represent the largest overhaul of Canada’s pesticide regulatory system in a generation. This comes as the government is also proposing to weaken key environmental standards under the Species at Risk Act and Impact Assessment Act. A broad coalition of organizations concerned with protecting human health and the environment, advocates for evidence-informed decision-making, and independent scientists have called for the pesticide act amendments to be …Read More
How Canada Keeps Toxic Pesticides on the Market
Canada’s proposed pesticide reforms move in the wrong direction.
By Bruce Lanphear
The following essay was published on May 22 as an OpEd in The Hill Times, a widely read independent newspaper in Ottawa that covers Parliament, federal politics, and public policy. It comes at a moment when Canada is beginning to rethink how it regulates toxic chemicals and pesticides.
While the United States allows the sale of chlorpyrifos and paraquat, Canada banned chlorpyrifos in 2023 and discontinued paraquat shortly afterward. These decisions reflect a growing recognition that some chemicals once considered acceptable carry costs that are measured not only in crop yields, but in children’s brains, chronic disease, and the long-term health of communities.
For more than half a century, pesticides like chlorpyrifos and paraquat were used in Canada under regulations that were supposed to protect human health. Yet one is now known to damage children’s brains, while the other increases the risk of Parkinson’s disease. If …Read More
Safe Food Matters Says Changes to Pesticide Law are Unscientific and Undemocratic
Safe Food Matters joins other health, environmental, legal and agricultural organizations urging the federal government to remove proposed amendments to the Pest Control Products Act (PCPA) from Bill C-30 and Bill C-31.
The groups warn that the changes weaken scientific and democratic accountability. They weaken Canada’s pesticide oversight system, reduce independent scientific scrutiny, and give politicians greater influence over decisions traditionally guided by scientific evidence.
The PCPA is the federal law that governs how pesticides are assessed, registered and regulated in Canada. Since 2002, the PCPA has been guided by a core principle: pesticides should only be approved when it has been shown with scientific evidence that NO HARM would arise to people, the environment or future generations from their use.
The amendments proposed in Bills C-30 and C-31 would represent the most significant overhaul of Canada’s pesticide regulatory framework in a generation.
What Would Change?
Among the most concerning proposals:
Bill C-30: Allows Political Whims to …Read More
Safe Food Matters Raises Concerns Over Federal Plan to Amend Food Safety Laws
Proposed federal amendments could shift Canada’s food safety priorities toward trade and affordability concerns.
Safe Food Matters is raising concerns over the federal government’s plan to amend key food safety legislation to include “food security and cost of food” as factors in regulatory decisions, warning the move could weaken longstanding health protections for Canadians.
The proposed changes, outlined in the federal government’s spring economic update and detailed in a recent Canadian Press report, would amend both the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act and the Pest Control Products Act. While Ottawa says the amendments are intended to support affordability and food security, critics warn the language suggests a broader shift toward prioritizing trade and industry interests over public health protections.
A Department of Finance official stated that the government remains committed to safeguarding the environment and protecting the health and safety of Canadians, adding that further details will be provided once legislative amendments are …Read More
Holding Health Canada to Account on Glyphosate
Safe Food Matters is standing strong in its challenge over dismissed objections and failed risk assessment
By Mary Lou McDonald, President, Safe Food Matters
Glyphosate was re-registered by Health Canada in 2017, and Canadians were granted 60 days to file any objections. The Pest Control Products Act (the Act) permitted this pursuant to its mandate to “facilitate public participation in the decision-making on pesticides”. Safe Food Matters Inc. filed a notice of objection (NoO) on June 27, 2017.
The Notice of Objection
There were nine objections in the notice. They followed three themes.
Pre-harvest spraying of glyphosate on crops raises a health risk that wasn’t examined in the scientific assessment. Consumption of these crops (like chickpeas) has increased significantly since the assessment.
The ten-fold safety factor to protect children had not been applied.
The labels for how to spray weren’t good enough to protect Canadians from the risks.
When we submitted the objections, we thought …Read More
BILL C-224 IS NOW BEFORE THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Bill C-224 has successfully just passed 2nd reading–the bill was unanimously passed and is now before the Standing Committee on Health.
What is Bill C-224?
Bill C-224 repeals the changes that were snuck into the 2023 Budget Bill. Those changes put Natural Health Products into the therapeutic drug model and made them subject to $5 million per day fines for sharing truthful health information.
Historic: 157,057 Canadians Back Charter of Health Freedom Petition
In this powerful moment in the House of Commons, MP Blaine Calkins tables one of the largest paper petitions in Canadian history — signed by 157,057 Canadians.
Initiated by the Natural Health Products Protection Association (NHPPA), the Charter of Health Freedom Petition represents a massive grassroots movement calling for Canadians’ right to make informed decisions about their own health.
The petition calls for:
•Personal sovereignty over one’s own body
•Freedom to choose how to prevent and treat illness
•Access to natural health products and …Read More
Legal Challenge Filed Over Federal Approval of PFAS Pesticide
As Health Canada and ECCC Move to Eliminate PFAS, PMRA Approves Two “Forever Chemical” Pesticides
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA, February 12, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — Health and environmental organizations have filed a Federal Court application challenging Health Canada’s approval of cyclobutrifluram, a fluorinated pesticide classified as a PFAS, for use on food crops in Canada.
The application, filed on Jan. 19, 2026, seeks judicial review of a decision by Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) authorizing cyclobutrifluram for use on romaine lettuce and as a soybean seed treatment.
Safe Food Matters is leading the case, joined by co-applicants Friends of the Earth Canada and Prevent Cancer Now.
The applicants allege the PMRA acted unreasonably, did not comply with the law, and were biased in their assessment. They say the approval is inconsistent with federal policy and that PMRA failed to properly assess the risks associated with the PFAS chemical, part of a class of substances known to …Read More








